« request for information: bus stops on diamond freeway interchanges |
| gardening the bus roof: a pretty idea but ... »
Read Will Doig's fine short article at Salon today, and not just because it quotes me.
Posted on 03/03/2012 in Technophilia | Permalink
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
Flowing curves and nice shapes
Really? I mean, really? One can certainly argue that things like having bigger windows or higher ceilings make the bus experience marginally more pleasant, but does anyone really care whether the bus they're riding is round or square? This just reminds me too much of the reports on BRT that I read that talk about the importance of having "stylized" "BRTVs" (Bus Rapid Transit Vehicles), as if by calling it a BRTV, people could be fooled into thinking it's not a bus.
03/03/2012 at 17:11
Anonymouse. I do think transparency over the largest possible surface is fundamental. Square vs round must be left to the taste of the age, which has already done one complete revolution in the last 70 years.
Jarrett at HumanTransit.org |
03/03/2012 at 17:37
C'mon the Salon article is awful (granted Salon isn't known for its intellectual heft...): it's unfocused and vague, uses bogus implications ("bicycles became cool -> buses will become cool too!" [what?]), and in the end doesn't really seem to reach much of a conclusion stronger than "buses: they could suck less."
It's not even very clear what the author is actually defending or what he really advocates (BRT? pretty buses? air-conditioned bus stops?).
The only really good and memorable point it makes is the one they got from you: in some cases, frequency might make it worth it.
Miles Bader |
03/03/2012 at 17:49
Someone should tell the author that trains have wheels too.
The biggest things are no brainers: bus stop bulbouts and exclusive bus lanes. The author also points out why these haven't been done: NIMBYism (also the empty lanes attack).
So it goes.
03/04/2012 at 03:41
I don't want to sound like a sycophant - but I'm 100% with Miles. An article written by Jarrett himself wouold have been much better. Talk about money for old rope!
Alan Howes |
03/04/2012 at 08:13
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
(You can use HTML tags like <b> <i> and <ul> to style your text. URLs automatically linked.)
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
Name is required to post a comment
Please enter a valid email address