« is walkability a right? how would this work in india? | Main | slippery word watch: commute »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


A little more line spacing would improve readability.


Lower-case post titles: B


C - never noticed




The overall new page blog text width is a bit narrow for my tastes though.




I think "irritating affectation" is strong, but it is annoying when I want to share a post on Twitter or Facebook and have to capitalize it myself, so:



I love the overall look, and the serif typeface.

Regarding the lowercase titles, my vote is B+. I do think it would be easier to read with regular title case, but it's not particularly irritating, and it's arguably part of your style, which is a good enough justification for me.

My only real complaint with the new design is actually the header image. I think the cross-fading looks kind of cheesy and down-market -- not the image that I assume you're going for. I think it would look much nicer if you kept the map, but got rid of the bus/city picture, and moved your picture to the right-most column (you could call it "the author", for consistency).


I'm not really a fan of the serif typeface, but I absolutely love everything else. Especially the new header image.

As to the post titles, I'd never noticed it before, but now that it has been pointed out to me it sort of bugs me.

Tom West

I find sans-serif *much* more legible on screen. That aside, I like the new look - much better suited to today's screen resolutions.



And if you hadn't said anything, I wouldn't have noticed you redesigned either. I read for the content, not the look.

Miles Bader

A nice looking revamp, although maybe the article font size is a bit small.

I mainly like the fact that the text area seems to be wider... before both the stories and comments seemed to be squished so that they took up tons of vertical space.


Lower case can be 'applied' to selected content, such as titles, via style sheets (CSS). If it's a choice made for style and design, that's the way to do it. The more purely-content the content is, the better not only for minimal fuss during a design update but also better for readability for all and especially for those using assistive tools and tech such as screen readers and low-vision modifications.
I find the legibility of the main text to be fine, the main navigation menu labels passable , and the sub-navigation labels poor.
Requiring sub-menus to access the content is poor usability. There are cases where this will not work, and cases where it will but not well. If clicking or tapping any top-level menu item (hover or click-and-drag could still use the exploding submenus) went to a page offering an overview and links, this could address many issues, including the problems with a long list of sub-menu options. Giving 'too much info' a useful format is in your wheelhouse, right? For a quick CMS solution I might try a tag cloud for the categories that uses font size to indicate volume of posts. For cites I'd add a geographic breakdown by country or continent, and possibly a map, and as a reader I'd love to see groupings that suggest other cities with key similarities.
I'll stop, before I have to fetch my web design soapbox - this is a transit blog!



Colin Stewart

In general, the overhaul is a big improvement. Much easier to find things. I particularly like that the "Stuff you need to know" is very prominent.

Now for the nitpicking: I don't mind the lower-case post titles, but they jar a bit with the upper-case blog title and menu links. Some consistency would be good. Same goes for the somewhat arbitrary mix of serif and sans serif fonts. On the whole though, this is a big step up.

Robert Wightman

Thank God; someone else has found how to use serif fonts. Many people with learning disabilities find them easier to read. Now if you could only do it for comments. Looks great, I love it.


Is it just me or still no search function? [Am I blind?!?]


Looks pretty good!


The website is much better, but the image up top doesn't fit.

The Burnaby and New Westminster bus network doesn't make any sense. It's arterial network is reasonably well-spaced continuous-enough grid connecting pretty well to rapid transit. The bus network is an incomprehensible, infrequent loopy bowl of spaghetti that could, if it followed from the arterial network, be much more simple and frequent.

Ben G

A suggestion for the banner image: See if you can get with TriMet and have them let you photograph an off duty bus with the electronic signage above the front window changed to say "HUMAN TRANSIT". That would be cool :)

Alan Robinson


I second Michelle's comments on the sub-menus. Multiline items (especially without indentation) and an excessive number of selections make them hard to use.

I like the new fonts. I find the header visually confusing. Both the neighbourhood labels on the map and the subtitle are grey and sans-serif. The blue text on the map is darker than the subtitle. The map background is light pink that blends into your head while your white shirt blends into the title background. It took me several seconds to be able to distinguish between the header elements on my first look.

I liked the idea behind your previous header images. That is, to avoid using abstract representations of transit and mobility and rather to have a image of a human having a good transit experience.



Andrew in Ezo

Agree with Alan above about the previous header image- you can't do much better than riding the Hankyu Railways to Kyoto (the image is of their station at Katsura). But I suppose this being a bus-oriented blog, the new image is more appropriate.


The drop down menu is a bit buggy. Because the "drop down" part is a few extra pixels below the item, if you move your mouse downwards too slowly, the drop down will disappear and you can never get to it. (Browser is FF 22.0 on Windows 8)

I also second Michelle's suggestion of having the menu items link to a separate page with all the submenu links.

Alan Howes

not sure I am too keen on the serif typeface, but if you hadn't said i would probably not have noticed.

but with firefox i can't get even your work-round to work on those long drop-downs. the only way i could get to "wellington" was to shrink my page so small i could hardly read it.

(can i go back to capitals where appropriate now, please?)



I don't like the serif, though, pretty much any sans-serif is better readable for me on the screens (and this will remain so till 200+ dpi computer screens will become mainstream I guess).


Ditto to @Colin Stewart's comments about titles and general layout.

I generally like the new header image. Maybe if the vehicle was red or another stronger color the whole things wouldn't feel a little washed out. I will say (with love) that there is something about that picture of you. I feel like you're silently judging me for conflating transportation vehicle types with service levels and perceptions of coolness! (But I think it's good to have an image of yourself, helps with branding the page as being from you and your consulting expertise. Just smile a little...)



"Irritating" is too strong, I'd go for something more like "bizarre and unnecessary affectation" :)

I like the new design!



I mostly like the new design, except the sans-serif comments, and that having you staring at me from the masthead is a little unsettling.


Nice and clean. At first I cringed when I saw "Georgia" in my RSS reader, but when I visited the site it's very tastefully done!


The menus are too long. I can't see past "Language" in Categories for example. Also, if you go to a menu header, and move down, the menu disappears unless you move the mouse really fast. These problems are in Firefox.

I don't like the sans-serif, but it's not a big deal.

Other than that, it looks nice now. The new menus in particular are very sensible and accessible, except for the aformentioned technical issues.

Re lower case - I see no reason to change it. I vote C with a touch of A.





jeff wegerson


Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...