« bus-rail debates in a beautiful abstract city, and in los angeles | Main | minneapolis: unlocking downtown with transit malls »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454714d69e2012875c77fb4970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference london: the circle reaches an end:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Jeffrey Bridgman

I wonder how the Yamanote line in Tokyo works... perhaps recovery isn't an issue since trains run so frequently, people rarely look at the schedule (except to see when service starts in the morning, or ends at night), so who knows, maybe they don't follow the schedule at all during the day. I think they run like 300 trains a day, who's gonna know if it's actually 299! ;)

Alon Levy

Jeffrey, my understanding of Japanese scheduling is that all trains follow a schedule, even subways, and if a train is more than 5 minutes late, the operator produces delay certificates for the riders to be able to explain why they were late for work.

anonymouse

The Yamanote Line (and Moscow's Circle Line) have the benefit of dedicated tracks, without the many merge conflicts and flat junctions that London's Circle has. In Moscow, it's also standard practice to not run trains at full speed, so that when a train falls behind schedule, there's some slack that can be picked up by going faster.

Anyhow, it's not obvious that the new arrangement in London is necessarily an improvement: you end up with Edgware Road as a chokepoint, with Circle and H&C trains running through the outer platforms, and District and Circle trains terminating on the inner platforms, plus there are more conflicts at Praed Street junction. It'll be interesting to see if this is in fact any better than the original arrangement.

jfruh

Another problem with circle lines is that trains have to be periodically reversed, or their wheels will wear asymmetrically!

Nathanael

Recovery wasn't necessary in London's Circle Line, because from a passenger POV it ran on headway operation -- "renumbering" was used to get the trains "back on time" to the extent it was needed.

What mattered -- the actual operational issue -- was being able to fit the trains in around the District, Metropolitan, and H&C trains.

I suspect the "teacup" will turn out to have severe operational problems. The problem comes, as noted, at Praed Street Junction, and when reversing at Edgware. If there were a four-track ROW from Praed Street to Edgware, or if the route from the west side of the circle stopped at Paddington, it would relieve operational problems. As it is it makes them worse.
It doesn't really provide space to get out of the way of the other lines, and the line crosses itself.

I wonder if they're going to end up making people change trains at Paddington when going west-to-north. This would be annoying as it's a long walk, but it *would* eliminate the operational problems by largely eliminating the use of Praed Street Junction.

Paul

I wonder then if an automated train system would be more suitable. It wouldn't need to take a break or a layover and so it can continuously keep running.

Andrew

The Yamanote Line in Tokyo uses an automatic train system that keeps the service running relatively consistently so that headways between services don't change significantly from one service to the next. The other thing they also do is they have two dedicated stations which are used for starting and terminating services (Osaki and Ikebukuro) as they have extra platforms.

Joel N. Weber II

For a transit system that runs in mixed traffic, can traffic signal priority that gives transit priority only when it's behind schedule help with the recovery time problem with loops? (Or, alternatively, that denies priority to vehicles that have gotten too close to the one ahead?) Also, can a system that instructs a vehicle to hold at a stop for an extra 30 seconds to help with keeping headways help out with this to some extent?

(In Boston in the United States, the SL1 bus route has a loop at the airport, and then runs in a line between a few other stations and South Station. There's a proposal to extend the bus tunnel to Chinatown / Boylston and then a portal, and I also wonder if a new portal right next to the I-90 westbound exit it uses into the bus tunnel could speed things up; in such a case, a one way loop of airport stops then I-90, the new portal, Courthouse, then South Station, then Boylston / Chinatown then out the Silver Line Phase III portal, to Hearld Street, to a new bridge into an existing tunnel under Fort Point Channel back to the airport seems like it might be more efficient than having to double back through Boylston / Chinatown, South Station, Courthouse, and probably World Trade Center by enough to outweigh the inconvience of waiting for a minute or two occasionally for schedule recovery. SL1 runs on very consistent 10 minute headways all day long, so it should probably run to maintain headway rather than on a constant schedule.)

The comments to this entry are closed.

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...