« quote of the week: railways vs democracy | Main | restless summer wandering »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454714d69e20133f1734196970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference can you find north underground?:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Cap'n Transit

The article didn't mention whether people pointed towards the North Pole, magnetic north, or in the north direction on the Manhattan grid, which is angled 28.5 degrees clockwise. I'm guessing that anything vaguely in that direction counted, but it would be interesting to know how many people have a sense of true north.

EngineerScotty


To followup to the Cap'n; an obvious follow-up question for Mathattan residents would be "which way is uptown"?

Aaron Priven

I was impressed by this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/17/nyregion/17direction.html

New York Region
Surface Navigation Help for Subway Riders
By JAMES BARRON
Published: October 17, 2007
The city is experimenting with a new way to help people orient themselves as they emerge from subway stairwells.

MU

Just want to take minor exception to your postulate that "Only a spatial navigator can tell you if a map works well. Only a narrative navigator can tell you if directions do."

The best test of a system is if a person who is NOT a natural to that system can use it effectively. Good directions should allow a spatial navigator to find their way and a good map will guide narrative type. Systems designed for the "natural" tend to be even more obscure to the person who does not normally think in that way.

Paul C

I tend to be both a spatial and narrative navigator. A good map can help both. The narrative navigator will read the map and think about the process of the route they need to take. Example turn left here turn right there and so on. While the spatial navigator will visualize about how they are into relation to everything else.

That is why when there is a detour a narrative navigator can become easily lost. Because now their story of directions has been mixed up. While a spatial navigator because they have a sense of their relation to other things. Don't tend to get lost because even though they are on a different path. They know where they are in relation to their old path.

Chris

I'm a bit confused by the experiement cited. How did Mr Vinci manage to measure the 3.6 steps he'd need to take to get back to his starting point?

Jarrett at HumanTransit.org

@ Chris.  The Pythagorean theorem?  Or more likely an innate sense of distance that spatial navigators often have.

Joey

+1 Chris. I was thinking the same thing.

Perhaps if he did the 2 steps + 3 steps forward without spinning again (i.e., completing the rectangle along a different path), that would have illustrated the same point as the diagonal, without requiring the spacial equivalent of perfect pitch.

Chris

Jarrett - I was thinking of him walking the hypotenuse (sp?) but blindfolded it just seems too complicated to work out how to measure 0.6 of a step, even for a spatial navigator.

I'm clearly not one, despite always being very good with maps.

Paul C

@Chris

Mr Vinci didn't manage to measure the 3.6 steps. What he did know was that from where he was standing home was at an angle to where he presently stood. That is what spatial orientation is all about. The idea that someone knows where they are in relation to everything else.

I guess one way to describe is a narrative navigator when following a GPS. Would just follow the directions. So long as the GPS is correct everything is fine. But if the GPS messes up they get messed up.

Now a spatial navigator would follow the same directions. At the same time though in their head they are thinking about where they are in relative terms to other things. Now if the GPS starts to mess up. They can then use their internal map to fix things.

I'm a spatial navigator by far and in all my years. I've only ever had it once mess up on me. It happened in a mall. I went out the wrong door thinking it was a different door. Although as soon as I was outside I realized what I had done and just walked around to the side I really wanted.

Ed O

The spatial navigator wouldn’t be able to step diagonally back to the start if there was a brick wall in the way. He’d then have to switch to the ‘route-following’/narrative strategy. It’s normal for everyone to get lost sometimes and most people are capable of changing their strategies to cope with this – or they can ask for help. Jarrett, is your frustration with Sydney's complex non-grid road network based on an expectation that the 'path-integration strategy' is (or should be) naturally applicable to all environments?

Jarrett at HumanTransit.org

@Ed O.  Not at all.  Sydney has been a fun challenge for me as a spatial navigator, but that's because I enjoy thinking about navigation.  I do think that legibility is an underrated value in urbanism, so I think that the ease with which anyone can memorise the entire map of Midtown Manhattan's grid is worth something.  But Sydney is what it is.  If I comment on the barriers it presents to transit, that's just an observation, not a judgment. 

Sometimes I may comment on a city grid from a purely aesthetic standpoint.  I think I once said that the street network of Paddington looks like expressionist art by someone with a really bad headache.  But even that isn't a claim that anything "should be" different.

Peter S.

In the not-so-distant, trans-humanist future, we'll all have unerring direction (and a whole lot else):

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/15.04/esp.html

Paul C

@Ed O

In regards to the brick wall being in the way. While a spatial navigator may decide to back track their steps to get around the wall. They don't have to and may decide to go a different route to get around the wall. Of course this all depends on whether or not the spatial navigator knows how big this wall is. The higher the chance of not knowing the size of the wall the better the chance of back tracking.

Chris

@ Paul C

Ah, that makes a lot more sense.

I'd probably have a good idea where I was relative to my starting point, but I'd probably follow my steps back as I'd think that was the most reliable way of getting there.

david vartanoff

For direction humor. In the SF Bay Area Interstate 80 East and 580 West share an alignment running north south. In NYC the Transit Authority arbitrarily defines trains as either NB or SB. Thus E,F,V Trains from Queens Blvd to Manhattan are SB. Also the current M from Ridgewood Queens to Lower Manhattan is SB. However, when the V is abolished and the M takes over the V "North" of B'way Laf, it will be NB from Ridgewood and SB from Queens Blvd. In earlier times, the Pennsylvania RR designated trains from DC to NY and Boston as Eastbound, and the Southern Pacific designated all trains as either Westbound if headed to San Francisco or EB if away. Thus a train From LA to Portland changed "direction" and number while passing through Oakland.

Pedestrianist

@David Vartanoff
That brings to mind the ridiculous convention of pretending Market Street (and therefore the whole SoMa grid) in SF runs East-West. It's not so hard to describe heading Northeast on a street, and the confusion it generates for people unfamiliar with the convention wastes any savings, IMO. Plus it's silly, when describing the corner a building might be on, to say it's the Southwest corner when it's dead South. [/grumble]

Chris

After reconsidering I'm definitely a spatial navigator. I can follow directions, but I sure can't give them. Yesterday I was confronted by a foreign visitor to Manchester University who wanted to get from the north campus to the south on foot. After looking at the map she had my advice basically amounted to "follow this red line on the map, it's simple". She was obviously bemused, but too polite to tell me so.

The comments to this entry are closed.

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...