« portland: a local alternative to the columbia river crossing | Main | the price is right: market-based parking comes to new zealand (guest post) »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454714d69e2017c31fb418c970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference washington dc: new network maps, with frequency!:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Alex B.

Metro's own blog also has a post up explaining the draft changes, complete with some side by side comparisons to the old map:

http://planitmetro.com/2012/09/19/metrobus-system-map-redesign/

Phantom Commuter

L.A. Metro used to have a "12 Minute" Map that became the "15 Minute" map. Sadly, it turns into a "60 Minute Map" on nights and weekends ! These maps are a great way to see gaps in the current transit system. Transit advocates need to insist that the "Frequent Network" include nights and weekends !

Zoltán Connell

"The big red lines generally correspond with the most frequent lines, but WMATA didn't use a single frequency threshold to decide which ones qualify... WMATA primarily looked at the line's ridership and its span of service, such as how many days per week the line runs and how many hours per day"

So this map doesn't even come with any guarantees of how frequent the routes are, or how late they operate! The red lines seem to correspond merely to "vaguely decent service". Given the big red lines make a bold statement about the usefulness of those routes, such guarantees are important.

What's more, no guarantees whatsoever are made with regard to what other routes offer, even though it seems a matter of chance whether some reasonably frequent routes are judged to merit a thick red line or not.

I've said this here before, but if a single frequency standard fails to capture a large proportion of the network, then multiple standards are in order. In the case of DC, there are a few lines with really good service; about every 10 minutes, and a whole lot of lines that operate about every 20.

So a better map would show those as two distinct parts of a frequent network, emphasising the 10-minute elements. It would continue to de-emphasise lines that are less than every 20, on which a schedule is definitely needed.

Alex B.

Zoltan,

Metro did a 15-minute frequent map (more as an analysis than a communication tool):

http://planitmetro.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/15-Minute-Map-DRAFT-20101122.pdf

It's also worth noting that this new map isn't just a frequent network map, but a full redesign of the entire bus map.

Gavin Seipelt

I wonder why the 90 and 92 on that map don't extend to link with Woodley Park Metro station?

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...