« among the young, decline in driving is not about poverty | Main | seattle reveals its frequent network »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454714d69e2017c33d7b23e970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference melbourne: updated frequent network map reveals grid gaps:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Daniel Bowen

Great work from Campbell Wright.

You can see a similar (but less nicely presented!) set of 15 minute maps for Melbourne, comparing Peak, Interpeak (as shown above), weekends (Saturday to be precise) and evenings (10pm) here:

http://www.ptua.org.au/2012/10/03/frequent-services-still-lag/#maps

On Jarrett's point about the Smartbuses, yes, it's true they are trouble-prone, with scheduling issues due to length (punctuality problems and/or long layover times along the route). But they do help to create a grid (if somewhat widely spaced) in conjunction with the radial rail system (not all of which is shown in Campbell's maps, because some lines run only every 20 minutes interpeak).

In fact it's arguably better to think of the Smartbuses as a large number of feeder/crosstown routes all strung together. Few people, after all, are going to travel their whole length (Frankston to Melbourne Airport via every point in the known universe takes about 4 hours - the more direct route mostly using radial rail services should take less than half that).

A proposed additional Smartbus, the "blue" orbital, would have provided an inner-city crosstown route which included the inner-northern suburbs.

Morgan Wick

Since you used King County Metro's old map to illustrate the need for useful information on system maps, have you seen their new map?

Craig

Although it's a good first draft, there are some errors & omissions - including leaving off the Alamein Line branch. I won't bore you all with the various errors with the bus route lines I picked up.

Many combined corridors have been left off - the idea to include the 513 & 527 along Bell Street/Northland corridor was a good one, just a shame this wasn't done in many other parts of the map. It doesn't take extensive knowledge to include these routes - the PTV website highlights most of them as combined timetables. I'd also have liked to see the map show the standard destinations though for routes that aren't fully shown on the map, rather than misleading information like 513 is West Coburg to Heidelberg!

Although I can appreciate the reasoning behind why a giant chunk of the train network was left off the map, it does make the map look quite bare, even if you started adding landmarks to the map.

Possibly the solution would have been to show the 15 min or better segments of the network in modal colour of blue, and then the 20 min lines in a faint grey to at least show their existence (& maybe dashed lines for those >20 minutes). There is little point showing the 901 or 902 driving through the north if people can't see any reasonable options to connect with them! I could imagine someone in the City using this map & deciding to take the 86 then 902 to reach Greensborough rather than waiting the extra few minutes for the much faster rail option!

Given the scale, maybe the map could even show the various 20 minute interpeak bus routes in grey as well, maybe with less detail such just route labels without the text boxes at terminuses.

Maybe a supplementary weekend version should be developed too, given the poor cousin our buses are on weekends.

Overall, a good idea but needs some work to before being worthy of the public domain.

Julian Wearne

Glad to see a post on Melbourne Jarrett.

The map indeed does highlight some of the shortcomings of the Melbourne network, not in the least the inability to find good information from the government agencies that are responsible for making the system legible to the general public. Interestingly, the PTV website and its predecessor the Metlink* website used to have a link that was to an interactive Metropolitan wide map. Unfortunately once you clicked the link it simply took you to a page saying that the map was being developed and would be coming soon. Which was "coming soon" since at least 2006. I asked a few times on when the map would be finished and I got some strange excuses. One stated that Metlink didn't know all the routes themselves, so they had to send out teams of people with GPS trackers to mark the routes properly! For an organisation that is responsible for the timetables and routes that seemed a mighty odd excuse, surely as they're responsible for signing off on a new route, they would have all that information beforehand. If not, asking the private bus operators for the information seems like an easier thing to do than sending out people to ride the buses all day with GPS devices... I hope they still plan on releasing this interactive map eventually, but even then I ponder its usefulness as I'm sure it will not include route frequencies.

*The agency responsible for timetables, maps, etc before the Baillieu Government created the PTV which is supposedly responsible for coordinating services between modes, no idea if anything has actually been done in that regards yet, it seems the organisation is little more than the previous Metlink and a bunch of staff from the Department of Transport... but I digress.

Daniel Bowen

@Julian, Metlink was never responsible for designing or signing-off routes. They were purely a comms organisation.

PTV subsumed Metlink, and *is* responsible for network design. They have done some work in timetable coordination, for instance bringing a pulse network to Sunbury:
http://www.danielbowen.com/2012/10/19/pulse-timetables-melb/

Julian Wearne

You're right Daniel, confused in the midst of too much study. The Department of Transport however were responsible for at the very least, signing off on routes and passing that information on to Metlink to help develop their map should not have been too difficult.

Lukas Nott

More scary is what is not shown... the extents of Melbourne not covered by the mapping. Most of Brimbank and all of the Melton/Wydham and Casey/Cardinia Growth Areas... A map of the whole of Greater Melbourne Metro Area would clearly show the disparity between inner and outer Melbourne. The people on the fringe being given no alternative but to drive. I think that's even more worrying than cross town connections.

neil wright

It's pertinent to note that Campbell was 17 years old and studying for his VCE (university entrance exams) at the same that he was developing his map. And yes, he'll be embarrassed when I mention his ATAR was 99.4 but credit where credit is due.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...