« my most "liked" posts of 2012 | Main | driverless cars and the limitations of the "complete imagined future" »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.


I think the reason that Portland Powerpoints are flying out to other cities isn't because the whole city of Portland is wonderful. It's because most cities are filled with the "fairly ordinary looking suburban fabric" shown above and have no idea on what a livable, mid-sized modern North American city could look like.


Both SE Division and SE 122nd, the two major thoroughfares at this intersection, would make excellent BRT lines. Division is already being considered for such, though no project has yet started to do that. But 122nd, a 5-lane thoroughfare with on-street parking, could also be modified to support faster N/S transit; the 71 which runs along it is a fairly successful crosstown line.


It also should be noted that Portland's new mayor was, both during a prior stint on the city council and in his private practice in between government gigs, a big proponent of the Portland Streetcar. It has long been assumed, including by many of his critics (who derisively call him "Streetcar Charlie"), that he would continue an inner-city focused development system--but here, he is directly answering a major criticism of Portland's recent transit changes: that it has focused too much on downtown land-use reform, at the cost of lower-quality service in outer and suburban neighborhoods.


As a former Portland resident now living abroad, I often have to explain to people that a minority of Portland is "Portlandia," and that most of the land area of the city on the east side is quite suburban. Actually, though, the part of the city that I would nominate as most "fascinating" to borrow a phrase from above, most in need of an "actionable plan" (read: outside money rather than trying to beat it out of the people living there) is Brentwood-Darlington where large numbers of residences aren't even on paved streets.

The Overhead Wire

If anyone actually stops to listen to what the people from Portland are ACTUALLY saying, the ones I have seen never claim to be perfect and want you to know that the city isn't. At least that is what I get out of hearing Portland folks talk.


Ladyfleur makes a good point: there are entire cities where there is NOTHING BUT suburban sprawl; where there is no visible downtown at all. I'm sure you can all think of examples. "Small" examples like Spokane. "Big" examples like Phoenix.


Nice post!

Jonathan Parker

Others are onto it. It's not that Portland's perfect. I've been there twice and it's definitely got it's beautiful & ugly places just like anywhere else (mostly positive). It's just that other cities/regions are so terribly car-dominant that Portland stands out among US regions of its size by comparison. There are other US cities that do and have a legacy of strong transport/land use planning (Arlington, VA, for example), but few can match the Portland's history of maintaining quality planning on the *regional scale* for several decades, which is an incredibly difficult task in the US context. To me, that is what sets Portland apart.

Joseph E

122nd and Division is part of East Portland. Most of this region, east of 82nd street, was developed after WWII in an auto-oriented suburban fashion when the land wasn't even part of the city of Portland; it was annexed to the city in the 1980s. The city has done an interesting study of the development of the area thru the last century: http://tinyurl.com/abgmsvt

I agree that both Division and 122nd would make good BRT (or light rail) routes. The right-of-way is at least 94 feet wide on each street at the intersection, and buildings are set back even farther. It would be technically easy to add exclusive lanes for transit while still preserving sidewalks, bike lanes, parking and car access. The politics is harder, but it happened on Burnside just a couple of miles north of Division, when the Blue Line light rail was added.


Sharon: tax return us citizen living abroad That's right And that's our job is to, no matter what material that it is nott straightforward so consult your local planning office. He is one of tax return us citizen living abroad them.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...