From xkcd:
Note that the Y-axis is a log-scale, so this is not really a straight line. As longtime readers know, I prefer durable.
« more uk frequent network maps: nottingham | Main | fare-free transit spreading in europe? can cities do this on their own? »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83454714d69e2017c36eeba26970b
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference the unsustainability of "sustainability":
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Robert Cervero: The Transit Metropolis: A Global Inquiry
A rigorous but readable study of the transit choices made by a range of cities around the world, and how these choices have shaped the city for better or worse.
Richard Gilbert and Anthony Perl: Transport Revolutions: Moving People and Freight Without Oil
James S. Russell: The Agile City: Building Well-being and Wealth in an Era of Climate Change
David Sucher: City Comforts: How to Build an Urban Village, Revised Edition
Engaging book on the details of creating welcoming urban space.
Allan B. Jacobs: Great Streets
The definitive book on the ingredients of a great urban streetscape.
I'm guessing if a good definition for sustainability ever took hold, use of the term would plummet.
Posted by: Rob Fellows | 02/17/2013 at 21:39
This article caused me to re read your discussion on "Cities vs suburbs." It has made me appreciate the value of a "Liberal Arts" education. Even though I have a degree in Electrical Engineering my university made me take courses in English, History, economics and Philosophy to make me a more rounded person. The older I get the more I thank them for that.
The Radical Right has tended to devalue a liberal arts education as having no real value in the world. It only teaches you to think, analyze and question things. These are obviously not desirable traits in a post globalized society. The main reason for education in the eyes of many is job training and while a useful and laudable goal it is not the only one.
The reason that I like to read you blog is you literary background; it makes it more readable. Your highly logical mind that gets to the important points is also very helpful but I bet your unconventional background has made you a better planner. You have not been taught all the "Correct Methods."
Your mention of Latin has reminded me that in my Latin class we learned that the cities, urba, were built on the hills for defense. Those who could not afford to live in the city were forced to live outside the walls below the city or, sub urba.
Keep up the off the topic topics.
Posted by: Robert Wightman | 02/18/2013 at 07:54
"Durable"
I have resolved to start using it forthwith!
Posted by: Psychobikeology.wordpress.com | 02/19/2013 at 03:23
What's doubly amusing is that this comic is contradicted by another xkcd comic: http://xkcd.com/605/
Posted by: AJP | 04/11/2013 at 10:44