« the new look at humantransit.org | Main | "running transit like a business": digging under the slogan »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Mike Hicks

Thanks for writing up this simple issue that has such broad repercussions. I remember being thoroughly confused when the Northstar commuter rail line was built in Minnesota partly because I had previously heard the phrase "commuter airline" in other contexts -- something that really means "regional airline" or something similar. So when "commuter rail" came along, I had no idea that planners really absolutely meant peak-time trips.


I've actually also heard people use the word "commute" to refer only to peak hour travel to and from work on a specific mode. I think when I've heard this, it's normally used to refer to the sort of regional heavy rail systems like Metrolink in LA or LIRR/NJTransit in NYC. But I think I've also heard it used specifically for people who take the subway to work. I don't think I've ever heard anyone use the word "commute" to refer to mode when the mode is city bus or automobile, though maybe I have heard it with peak hour express buses.

James Bunting

A commuter is the holder of a commutation ticket, originally introduced by railway companies to provide reduced price travel between home and place of work. Here in the UK we have always called it a season ticket, but have adopted the derivative term commuter. This is now broadly used to signify someone who undertakes a regular journey, regardless of the form of transport used. You will hear people talk of 'my commute' in this context to describe a regular journey, not necessarily between home and work. As with so many words the media will often use it out of context for journalistic effect.

jack horner

What Jarrett said.

Using 'commuters' in a broad sense to refer to all public transport riders is bad, because the continuing association with 'commute' in the narrow sense (journey to work) may encourage people to assume that public transport is only about the journey to work.

Let us encourage people, when they want to refer to all PT users, not only in relation to the journey to work, to say passengers or riders, not commuters.


Journalists aren't the only ones who make this mistake. Currently the Transportation Research Board has a standing committee for "Commuter Rail Transportation" which is distinct from "Rail Transit Systems". The committee's purview is generally understood to be regional-level passenger service running on standard gauge, FRA-regulated trackage that connects to the national rail network, but that's a wholly separate issue from the service pattern--or at least it should be. It might seem like a little thing, but it ends up stifling research (eg promoting European S-bahn type operations in the US) that would be very helpful.


This, presumably, is also what the New York Times means when it refers to San Francisco's BART system as a "commuter train."

I think NYT is simply designating BART as the "commuter train" for San Francisco to differentiate it from the Muni, which is the "subway" or "urban rail" for San Francisco. It's still sloppy wording, but it's the NYT trying to impose New York City modes onto other cities' rail networks, so that New Yorkers can picture the distances and frequencies of service in their minds.

Muni operates with stations closer spaced using shorter train sets as compared with BART, therefore Muni = NYC Subway and BART = LIRR, Metro North or NJT Rail. It's just a quirk of their NYC-centric thinking/writing style.


My regular commute is by car. So there! And in Seattle and Portland there are regular bicycle commuters. Clearly the nouns require adjectives to denote exactly what we're speaking about.

As for "literature students" I think any well-educated liberal arts student, who understands nuance, will do.


Many anti-transit advocates use this equivocation as a basis for mischief. The local libertarian think-tank, for example, routinely suggests improved express bus service as a less-expensive replacement for true rapid transit, noting that it's sometimes faster (and a limited-stop bus moving on a free-flowing freeway can indeed reach high average speeds). But anyone knowledgeable about the subject knows that the two products are not interchangeable in function, and such appeals are made to attract suburbanites who (by and large) mainly care only about peak trips to the city center in the morning, and back again in the evening.

Robert Wightman

The dictionary meaning from Miriam Webster is:

Definition of COMMUTE
transitive verb
a : change, alter
b : to give in exchange for another : exchange
: to convert (as a payment) into another form
: to change (a penalty) to another less severe
: commutate
intransitive verb
: make up, compensate
: to pay in gross
: to travel back and forth regularly (as between a suburb and a city)
: to yield the same mathematical result regardless of order —used of two elements undergoing an operation or of two operations on elements

The original meaning seems to be "to change" in some form or another. In D. C. motors there is a commutator which reverses the direction of the current in rotor windings every half cycle. This seems to work for a commuter as the travel in and then reverse direction and travel out on a regular cycle. The problem, as has been stated, is that it tends to ignore off peak and counter flow travel which should be cheaper to provide as most of the infrastructure and equipment is paid for and all you need to recover is incremental costs.


Here on SS Island,BC we have a population of 10,000 with 9863 registered vehicles and over 10,000 vehicles on the main road through town each day.
The CRD, which reports on traffic, has a statistic that:" the average household here makes 6.5 trips a day."
Trips is used instead of commutes.
We do have peak commute times but it is not much more than all the regular commuting done during the day.
The NOISE and STINK is horrendous now, especially so for those living beside or near the main road.

Chris Bradshaw

I see "commute" as referring to the daily round-trip to work or study within the daily cycle. Yes, transit authorities tend to limit it only to mean peak-hour (as you pointed out), and in the dominant to downtown in the a.m., reverse in p.m. (as Robert pointed out), or is of a long-enough distance to warrant specialized routes. Most who commute shorter distances use regular all-day/all-week routes.

The combination of longer distances, peak-hour, and the daily cycle translates into distances of about 10-15 km each way (much shorter than non-commute trips), and this usually necessitates that it be "rapid." Rapid means that the vehicles travel faster, are on rights-of-way separate them from the rest of traffic (so as to avoid 'congestion' from cars and trucks and 'conflicts' from human-powered travelers), and have stations/stops 2-3 times as distant from each other.

The reference to commuter subscription services -- the monthly pass, usually -- refers to the favouritism provided the peak-hour commuter covering these longer distances. They typically pay a fee equal to about 75% of what they would pay in individual fares if they didn't buy the pass.

And this brings up another matter of "commuters": commuters rarely use the transit system for trips other than commuting; they own cars that are used for all other travel (even for short in-neighbourhood trips, according to stats). If many 'commuters' used it at other times (which is effectively discouraged by having to walk twice as far, wait twice as long for the off-peak buses), they would not need to provide any contribution to the additional costs.

The 'commuter' is the "choice" patron, thanks to owning a car; the rest are "captive" (transit-biz terms) for NOT having a car. The senior is such a user, no longer needing to commute and therefore not able to reliably PREDICT at the beginning of any one month whether their use will exceed the accumulated singe-fares they would expend to justify buying a monthly pass.

Alan Howes

Well I must say that, working in an international context, I regularly use the term "Commuter Rail" to refer to suburban Heavy Rail systems like METRA and S-Bahn. I suppose it could also be used for what was, in the UK, Southern Electric - or at least its suburban component, although the UK is a little different in that there is more of a continuum between suburban rail, regional rail and inter-city rail (on the passenger side).

But in other anglophone countries terminology is different again. In (arguably anglophone) India, the term "commuters" is regularly used to describe the body of travellers by public transport - at least in published media, I'm not sure what the professionals say. I once picked someone up on their use of the term, but it seems its accepted terminology there.


I believe the term originated in Australia, and was drawn from the same root as 'commuting' prison sentences or hanging!

The nineteenth cnntury gentleman, using the train to the same place every day and paying a lot in fares (probably closer to air fare levels of today) would in his best Victorian English write a letter to the railway boss, usually a commissioner here, asking for pity over the cost,noting the benefit to the railway of his frequent custom, and 'praying' the honorable commissioner would 'commute' the fare, being 'your very obediant servant etc etc etc'. In the fullness of time, he would receive a letter telling him his fare was commuted. He would then take the letter to the ticket office at the station and pay a lower fare.

damien haas

The Australian Bureau of Statitics only counts 'trips taken to work' in its figures for public transport usage. this fails to include university students, school children, people not traveling on public transport outside the peak hours, people traveling to sporting events or the elderly.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...