« rebutting the "vagrancy" argument against free fares | Main | amazon extends ebook sale of my book: 86% off! »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Tom West

I would argue it will be sooner than 2040, if one defines Millennials as those born from the mid-1980s onwards. The oldest are aroudn 30, and senior politicians tend to be in their 40s or 50s. I'd expect to see Millennials in power by 2030.


@Tom Local govt might be even quicker, so we can expect more city-state/Fed rift first. Vancouver, Calgary and I'm sure others have young GenX mayors, and loads of GenY on staff.

Jim Moore

"It's not an easy question..." ?!!

Seriously, this is such an easy question to answer if people really do love children as they claim.

This is the question that cuts to the chase. Great writing Jarrett.

Wai Yip Tung

Congratulations! Your article is one of the two appeared on the facing page, opposite to the article from President Obama! And yours is my favorite among the two :)

Dexter Wong

Thank you for printing that much of your Chronicle column here. All that the Chronicle shows to non-subscribers is an introductory sentence.

Andre Lot

Isn't this just the way politic administration in general works - the aspirations of any giving cohort are only met with very serious considerations when such cohort is on the 2nd half of their lives.

I think that is the rule rather than the exception. What is the exceptional are circumstances like post-WW2 Europe, when the carnage of war suddenly set aside the "old guard" and gave rise to politicians that had grown with 2 world wars and a major global depressions as their major references in life, something that shaped the following 30 years of European politics until 1973 at the earliest.

Acceptance of women in the military had become stronger since the cultural shifts of the early 1970s, especially after the move to an all-volunteer force. Yet, it took at least 2 decades for a big push in the military to get woman into serious, dangerous and live combat positions in large numbers that don't make then an 'oddity'.

While we are at it, isn't one of the great political stories of this time how the youth generation that brought tectonic shifts to sexuality, pop culture and social norms in the 1960 later swung back towards more conservative policies (especially economic ones)?

Generally speaking, it is not a matter of having a couple of "Gen Xs" or "Millenials" in power that would make a difference. It takes a longer time to the point where the majority of people on top political offices, social leadership positions, academia and especially economically powerful offices (CEOs, high managers, consultants) spouse a certain trend or attitude for it to get a significant shot of getting into laws and effective change, especially if it contradicts with an existing paradigm.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.


Post a comment

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...