« my letter to the globe and mail (update 1) | Main | word wars: urbanism, urban »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Eric O

I note that your argument on Crowley's piece, while indulging the partisan ring, is actually not taking the bait toward knee-jerk caterwauling, but stepping aside to consider the ignored participants. Way to school us on how to unmask the careful manipulation of the debate by Cox, et al. Being multi-dimensional, it turns out, actually ends up making one a more effective debater.

And it makes for a more interesting sport. Brilliant check hook. We enjoyed watching Crowley get spanked.

Steve Munro

I had the same sort of spike on my site with my article about Crowley. On Dec 29, in the middle of the expected holiday lull (not to mention the worst ice storm Toronto has ever seen), page views shot up to 2,213. This continued on Dec 30 with 2,286 although views of my article about Crowley dropped to second place.

My biggest complaint was the Globe's misrepresentation both including the sources cited and the characterization of the author as being from a bipartisan think tank when he is, in fact, a known right winger.

Yes, it is definitely worthwhile unveiling the hidden premises in arguments and the citations used to buttress them (for which thanks to Jarrett). But there are times when it is necessary to simply stand up and say "this is crap" that has no place in "Canada's National Newspaper".

Political argument on the continuum between "A" and "B" is valid, and it is worth reading all points of view if only to hone one's own position. (Moderating comments on my blog has been invaluable in that regard.)

But biased misrepresentation has to be called out for what it is. I am quite sure Crowley would have no interest in actual debate because once the props are knocked out from his premise, he does not have a thesis to support on independent merits. Unfortunately, this article is sure to be cited over and over in coming months and years by those who see road building as the solution to every problem.

Jeremy

While it's true that there's usually more to an issue than "my opinion" and "the other side", in many/most cases critical thinking is what leads you to fine tune a specific viewpoint, which may or may not be in line with a popular viewpoint (though I suppose many people decide their opinion without critical thinking). The important thing is to always think critically about new information and opinions and be willing to change your views if that makes sense, as opposed to adopting the dominant idea in our academic and political discourse that progress always means compromising between two distinct viewpoints (those articulated by people with institutional power) and considering nothing else.

Some questions you have to ask yourself when working with others are how strongly you believe in something, how important it is, and how to weigh that with the potential for progress to be made. That's not to say I can't have a very strong opinion or a position from which I won't budge; just that it's all complicated. Sometimes there can be solutions outside of a binary framework but not always. That has more to do with political realities than idealism.

David in Ottawa

I think you're making way too much of the Brian Lee Cowley article, in both this post and the others, especially on the point of the Globe & Mail carrying it. In your first post you even went so far as to categorize his article and his worldview as representing the Globe & Mail's position, which to me was just as insane as the article you were critiquing.

I knew from the moment I started reading it that it was opinion, not reporting. For one, it was marked as "Special to the Globe and Mail". That's an obvious giveaway. REALLY obvious. Secondly, it was in the 'Economy Lab' section. If you navigate to the Economy Lab page, you'll find a bunch of other like articles on economic topics that are similarly quasi-academic opinion pieces. It's a modern-day soapbox for economy-related articles.

I mean, here's one on the Harper government's position on carbon taxes. It is marked in the exact same fashion as the Crowley article. Most of the same basic critiques would apply to that article as well, andvirtually every other one on there:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/economy/economy-lab/harpers-distaste-for-carbon-taxes-is-bad-for-the-economy/article15822029/

How long would it have taken you to investigate just what the 'Economy Lab' section was, before flying into your own mini-rant about the Globe and Mail? . And I don't even read the Globe and Mail, so it's not like I had any particular prior knowledge about what the 'Economy Lab' section was all about. If you're going to write a mini-rant in response to another, you might first want to do a tiny bit of investigating before doing so...

I hate to say this, but seriously, get a grip. The Globe and Mail published a "though-provoking" article from someone not in its employ and got a discussion going. Isn't this what a free press is supposed to be doing?

Owen E

Perhaps the most important way many of us express our opinions is through elections, which are generally set up as binary decisions (most often - "conservative" vs "progressive"). Those who care more, actively advocate a position or candidate in an election; those who care less, simply vote - but it's basically binary at the end of the day. This is to a great degree the reason that we have been programmed to think in binary on so many issues.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

the firm

Jarrett is now in ...

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...